Yap
(PC) Handford v. Yap
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HANDFORD, Case No. 2:21-cv-00115-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND
V. YAP, FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 On March 9, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 5. I notified plaintiff that the complaint failed to state a claim and granted him sixty days to file an amended complaint. Id. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on July 22, 2021, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 8. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. I also warned him that failure to comply with the July 22…