(HC) Michael N. Chisom v. Madera County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL NARVELLE CHISOM, No. 1:21-cv-01368-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE
REMEDIES
MADERA COUNTY,
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER
Respondent. LEAVE TO AMEND RESPONDENT [TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE] 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition on September 13, 2021. (Doc. 1.) The petition appears to be unexhausted. In addition, Petitioner fails to name a proper respondent. Petitioner will be ordered to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed without prejudice, and he will be granted leave to amend the petition to name a proper respondent. DISCUSSION A. Preliminary Review of Petition Rule 4 of the Rules Governing…