(PC) Hammler v. Zydus Pharmacy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20211:21-cv-00343California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 1:21-cv-00343-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION

ZYDUS PHARMACY, et al., (Doc. No. 15)

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Allen Hammler is a state prisoner appearing pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 20, 2021, the court adopted findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 12), denying plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 10) and ordering plaintiff to pay the filing fee within 30 days. (Doc. No. 14.) As explained by the court, plaintiff had $1,830.45 in his inmate trust account when he filed his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id. at 2.) This is more than enough to pay the $402 filing fee for this action. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.