Garcia

(PC) Dillingham v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20211:18-cv-00579California352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY DILLINGHAM, No. 1:18-cv-00579-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

F. GARCIA, ORDER Defendant. (Doc. No. 157) 17 Jerry Dillingham (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 2, 2021, plaintiff filed what the court construes as objections to the magistrate judge’s order denying plaintiff’s second request for appointment of an expert witness (Doc. No. 156.) (Doc. No. 157.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), when reviewing a magistrate judge's order, “[t]he district judge in the case must consider timely objections and modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” See also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Local Rule 303. Under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.