Mkrtchyan

Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20212:17-cv-02366California1,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARAM MKRTCHYAN, No. 2: 17-cv-2366 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding, through counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 16, 2021, the undersigned conducted a hearing regarding plaintiff’s motion for sanctions for spoliation of evidence. Patrick H. Dwyer appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Matthew W. Gross and Carl. L. Fessenden appeared on behalf of defendants. For the reasons stated herein, and discussed at the September 16, 2021 hearing, further briefing is ordered regarding the alleged spoliation of videos. Plaintiff contends that on September 17, 2019, he asked defendants to produce all video of plaintiff while in custody at either the RCCC Jail or the Main Jail on or about the dates and times set forth in the first amended complaint in paragraphs 19, and 22-53. (ECF No. 44-1 at 10.) Plaintiff contends that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.