Nunery

Nunery v. Siemens Mobility, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20212:20-cv-00311California1,681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DEWITT NUNERY, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and aggrieved, No.: 2:20-cv-00311-TLN-AC

11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR REMAND

v. SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, ACARA SOLUTIONS, INC., a New York Corporation, ALERON GROUP, INC., a New York Corp, and Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendant,

18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Dewitt Nunery’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 7.) Defendant Siemens Mobility Inc. (“Defendant”) opposed the motion. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff replied. (ECF No. 13.) For reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. /// /// /// /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendant employed Plaintiff and other individuals as hourly nonexempt warehouse employees in California. (ECF No. 5-1 at 3.) On December 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed this putative class action in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.