Sutton

(PC) Washington v. Sutton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20211:20-cv-00983California900 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISAIAH WASHINGTON, 1:20-cv-00983 AWI-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES, AS

SUTTON, et al., APPARENT ON THE FACE OF THE

COMPLAINT

Defendants.

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF

TO RESPOND TO ORDER

18 I. BACKGROUND Isaiah Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) II. PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT - SUMMARY In the Complaint Plaintiff alleges that on September 23, 2019, he was subjected to a strip search during which officers found a pill in his sock and a cell phone in his anus. Plaintiff claims that he was sexually assaulted during the search when one officer stuck his hands in Plaintiff’s anus and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.