Sutton
(PC) Washington v. Sutton
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20211:20-cv-00983California900 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ISAIAH WASHINGTON, 1:20-cv-00983 AWI-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES, AS
SUTTON, et al., APPARENT ON THE FACE OF THE
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF
TO RESPOND TO ORDER
18 I. BACKGROUND Isaiah Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) II. PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT - SUMMARY In the Complaint Plaintiff alleges that on September 23, 2019, he was subjected to a strip search during which officers found a pill in his sock and a cell phone in his anus. Plaintiff claims that he was sexually assaulted during the search when one officer stuck his hands in Plaintiff’s anus and…