Corral

Corral v. California Highway Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20211:21-cv-00822California451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN CORRAL, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00822-DAD-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE v. ) TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS ) CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., ) [21-DAY DEADLINE]

Defendants. ) ) )

On August 9, 2021, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed the complaint and directed the plaintiff to file a first amended complaint within 30 days and pay the required filing fee at the time of filing. (Doc. 4.) More than 30 days have passed, and the plaintiff has not filed a first amended complaint. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.