(PS) Narayan v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20212:19-cv-00466California1,804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:19-cv-0466-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 121-124) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Before the court are four motions filed by plaintiff between September 2, 2021 and September 7, 2021. (ECF Nos. 121-124.) All four are related to plaintiff’s continuing insistence that the undersigned recuse from this case due to perceived bias against plaintiff. The court briefly addresses, and denies, each motion—and informs the parties that a hearing on the defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order (ECF No. 125) will be held via Zoom on October 13, 2021 at 10:00 AM (the noticed hearing date). I. Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 123) Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this case, moves the court to appoint counsel, claiming that he has been “bullied and taken advantage of” by the undersigned— and that he cannot afford an attorney. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.