(SS) McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAMELA MCKENZIE, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0327 JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST ) FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW (DOC. 19) AND v. ) REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT TO ) SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) KILOLO KIJAKAZI1 ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN ) FAVOR OF PAMELA MCKENZIE, AND Defendant. ) AGAINST DEFENDANT, KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY

Pamela McKenzie asserts she is entitled to supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge was erred in evaluating the record and the decision lacks the support of substantial evidence. (See generally Doc. 19.) For the reasons set forth below, the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). …