(SS) Dubord v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDOLPH ANTHONY DUBORD, IV, No. 2:20-cv-634-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 22, 27, 33.) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 On June 29, 2021 the magistrate judge filed amended findings and recommendations (ECF No. 33), which were served on the parties. The parties filed objections to the original findings and recommendations (ECF Nos. 30-31) and the court has considered them. Further, the magistrate judge instructed the parties to notify the court if either had additional objections to the June 29 findings and recommendations (see ECF No. 33 at 19), no party filed objections. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court…