Rogers v. Dignity Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20212:21-cv-00566California2,573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STEPHEN ROGERS, an No. 2:21-cv-00566-JAM-CKD individual; HELEN SCULLY, an individual; and NNEKA ANYANWU, an individual, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiffs, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES v. 14 DIGNITY HEALTH, a California corporation, doing business as METHODIST HOSPITAL OF SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 Stephen Rogers, Helen Scully, and Nneka Anyanwu (“Plaintiffs”) move to remand this labor and employment action back to the Sacramento County Superior Court. See Mot. to Remand (“Mot.”), ECF No. 11. Dignity Health (“Defendant”) opposes the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 14. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand.1 ///

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for August 10, 2021. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.