Kyle

I. BACKGROUND

21 This action arises out of Plaintiff’s claims for deliberate indifference to serious risk of 22 harm in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Kyle, Grossman, Thompson, 23 Depovic, Moreno, Overly, Wright, Gamez, and Castillo, and for retaliation in violation of the 24 First Amendment against Defendants Kyle, Moreno, Wright, Overly, Gamez, and Castillo. 25 (ECF Nos. 1, 10, 15, 17, 31.) 26 On February 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court order California 27 State Prison—Corcoran (“CSP-Corcoran”) to facilitate a deposition of Defendant K. Kyle by 28 videoconference. (ECF No. 81.) On March 2, 2021, the Court entered an order allowing the deposition to go forward by remote means for a maximum of two hours of questioning. (ECF No. 88.) The date selected for the deposition with Plaintiff’s agreement was March 22, 2021. (See id.) On May 10, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 99.) On June 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting to modify the Scheduling Order in this case to extend the motion to compel deadline as well as a to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file an 8 …