Eaton

(PC) Swortzel v. Eaton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20211:21-cv-00735California1,104 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRET LAWRENCE SWORTZEL, Case No. 1:21-cv-00735-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION EATON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

16 (ECF No. 6)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Background Plaintiff Bret Lawrence Swortzel (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 10, 2021, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust prior to filing suit. (ECF No. 6.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court’s order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.