(PC) Freeman v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20211:21-cv-00611California526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEROY FREEMAN, No. 1:21-cv-0611-NONE-JLT Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

KEN CLARK, et al., GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 7, 14) 16 17 Leroy Freeman was incarcerated at California State Prison-Corcoran when he was diagnosed with a condition that required surgical intervention. Plaintiff asserts that after his surgery, he did not receive proper care at CSP-Corcoran, which caused him to suffer permanent paralysis. Plaintiff seeks to hold Warden Ken Clark; Celia Bell, the CEO of Health Care at CSP- Corcoran; and unidentified medical providers liable for violations of his civil rights arising under the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. No. 1.) Defendants assert plaintiff’s allegations are insufficient to state a claim, and the claims plaintiff raised against Clark and Bell are barred. (Doc. No. 7.) The magistrate judge found the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.