Mayfield

(PC) Ramos v. Mayfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20211:21-cv-01036California7,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 LEOBARDO ERIC RAMOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01036-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH MAYFIELD, et al., AMENDMENT EXCESSIVE FORCE CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT Defendants.

MAYFIELD AND DEFENDANT DOE,

AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS BE

DISMISSED

(ECF No. 10)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

21 Leobardo Ramos (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on July 1, 2021. (ECF No. 1). On August 16, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 9). The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.