(PC)Jolivette
(PC)Jolivette v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL PATRICK JOLIVETTE, No. 2:21-cv-0407 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On June 15, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. In his amended pleading, plaintiff clarifies that he does not seek relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Rather, he wishes to register a “judgment from another district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1738.” Under that statute, federal courts are required to give “full faith and credit” to the decisions of state courts and the statute provides authentication requirements. Plaintiff asks that the court give full faith and credit to the decision of an alternative dispute resolution service. However, nothing…