Ciolli

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20211:20-cv-01802California9,094 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S FIFTH

AMENDMENT AND EIGHTH

A. CIOLLI, et al., AMENDMENT CLAIMS AGAINST A.

CIOLLI, MR. SCOTT, MRS. RODRIGUEZ

Defendants. MR. COBBS, A. LEGER, C. HANSON, MR.

YOUNG, AND JOHN/JANE DOES

THROUGH 15 AND THAT ALL OTHER

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED (ECF No. 22) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

21 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett (“Plaintiff”) is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in 22 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics 23 Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On August 5, 2021, after several screening orders and amendments 24 (see ECF Nos. 8-10, 16, 18),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.