(PC) Maestas v. Sacramento County Jail
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20212:21-cv-00665California1,327 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 8 RANDY V. MAESTAS, Case No. 2:21-cv-0665-JDP (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
v. PAUPERIS SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., ECF No. 11 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) FILE AN AMENDED
COMPLAINT, OR
15 (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT
SUBJECT TO A
RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE
DISMISSED
17 ECF No. 1
SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE
21 Plaintiff Randy V. Maestas bring this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and alleges that unnamed medical providers employed by the Sacramento County Jail violated his Eighth Amendment rights by denying him surgery for a hernia. ECF No. 1 at 3. Plaintiff admits, however, that he did not exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this suit. I will give him leave to amend
1 Plaintiff refers to his condition as a “herona,” but his description of his symptoms and the similarity in spelling leads me to believe that he is referencing a hernia. 28 his complaint and to…