(SS)Courtney

(SS)Courtney v. Social Security Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20211:18-cv-01244California817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLLEEN M. COURTNEY, No. 1:18-cv-01244-NONE-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS,

AND DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE AND

SECURITY, CLOSE THIS CASE

15 Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 46, 47, 48)

17 Plaintiff Colleen M. Courtney (“plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on September 13, 2018 seeking judicial review of the actions of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”) in assessing and collecting Supplement Security Income (“SSI”) overpayments. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

Plaintiff’s complaint identified the following defendants: (1) Social Security Office, Hanford, County of Kings; (2) Deborah L. Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel for the Social Security…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.