Castillo

(PC) Rodriguez v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20211:21-cv-00409California635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERLINDO RODRIGUEZ, JR. ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00409-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, )

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

) v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ACTION

D. CASTILLO, ) ) (ECF No. 11) Defendant. ) ) )

Plaintiff Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 27, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that the instant action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 11.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due within fourteen days. On September 14, 2021, the Findings and Recommendations were re- served on Plaintiff at his new address of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.