Ainely

Ainely v. City of South Lake Tahoe

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20212:16-cv-00049California3,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELA AINLEY, individually and as successor-in-interest for KRIS JACKSON, deceased; PATRICK JACKSON, No. 2:16-cv-00049-TLN-CKD individually and as successor-in-interest for 13 KRIS JACKSON, deceased, ORDER Plaintiffs, 15 v. CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; a municipal corporation; JOSHUA KLINGE, individually and as a police officer for the City of South Lake Tahoe, 19 Defendants,

21 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of South Lake Tahoe’s (“the City”) Motion for Summary Adjudication. (ECF No. 53.) Plaintiff Patrick Jackson filed a response. (ECF No. 56.) Plaintiff Angela Ainley joined in Plaintiff Jackson’s response. (ECF No. 59.) The City filed a reply. (ECF No. 60.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS the City’s motion.

The Court refers to Plaintiffs collectively in this Order. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from Defendant Officer Joshua Klinge’s (“Officer Klinge”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.