Jackson v. Fastenal Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20211:20-cv-00345California410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIESHIA MARIE JACKSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-00345-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY MATTER SHOULD

v. NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

FASTENAL COMPANY,

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 On January 21, 2020, Mieshia Marie Jackson (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, filed this action in the Stanislaus County Superior Court against Fastenal Company (“Defendant”) alleging violations of California labor law. (ECF No. 1-1.) On March 4, 2020, Defendant removed the action to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On May 28, 2020, the Court issued a phased scheduling order. (ECF No. 9.) On December 23, 2020, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court modified the scheduling order and extended the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for class certification until September 13, 2021. (ECF No. 11.) The deadline to file the motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.