Smolich

(PC) Whitfield v. Smolich

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20212:21-cv-01218California411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DEWAZE LAXOTTER WHITFIELD, No. 2:21-cv-01218 DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SMOLICH, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated July 20, 2021, the court ordered plaintiff to file a properly signed and dated complaint. (ECF No. 3.) Additionally, the court ordered plaintiff to either submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. (Id.) Plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and pay the filing fee or submit the in forma pauperis application. (Id. at 5.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to abide by the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) Thirty days have passed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, paid the filing fee, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, requested additional time to file any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.