Arnette

(PC) Jones v. Arnette

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20211:16-cv-01212California832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

vs. (ECF No. 107.)

ARNETTE, et al.,

Defendants.

15 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. On September 20, 2021, the court granted defendant Zamora’s request by special appearance for an extension of time to in which to file a response to the court’s order to show cause issued on August 6, 2021. (ECF No. 105.) On September 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections to the court’s order which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 107.) II. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Rule 60(b) allows the Court to relieve a party from an order for “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.