Olivas

(PC) Lipscomb v. Olivas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20211:21-cv-01127California3,826 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSIE LIPSCOMB, Case No. 1:21-cv-01127-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT

v.

J. OLIVAS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE FEDERAL CLAIMS BE

Defendants. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND THE

COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE

SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

STATE LAW CLAIMS

18 (ECF No. 6, 7)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

21 Plaintiff Jessie Lipscomb (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this 22 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and 23 Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on September 20, 24 2021, is currently before the court for screening. (Doc. 6.) 25 Plaintiff also filed on September 20, 2021 a motion for an extension of time to file his 26 amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s screening order. As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.