Arrizola
(PC) Brooks v. Arrizola
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20211:20-cv-00476California607 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAMAR BROOKS, 1:20-cv-00476-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY
ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS
vs. CASE
ARRIZOLA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
Defendants. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT
C/O ARRIZOLA FOR USE OF EXCESSIVE
FORCE IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH
AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL OTHER
CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE
DISMISSED
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
22 Lamar Brooks (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on April 3, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Correctional Officer (C/O) Arrizola, Sergeant Stane, and Lieutenant Fitzpatrick (collectively, “Defendants”), and brings claims for excessive…