Arrizola

(PC) Brooks v. Arrizola

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20211:20-cv-00476California607 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAMAR BROOKS, 1:20-cv-00476-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

vs. CASE

ARRIZOLA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

Defendants. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT

C/O ARRIZOLA FOR USE OF EXCESSIVE

FORCE IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH

AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL OTHER

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

22 Lamar Brooks (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on April 3, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Correctional Officer (C/O) Arrizola, Sergeant Stane, and Lieutenant Fitzpatrick (collectively, “Defendants”), and brings claims for excessive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.