Castillo

(PC) Scott v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20211:20-cv-00598California600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK A. SCOTT, 1:20-cv-00598-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

vs. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT

C/O CASTILLO FOR USE OF EXCESSIVE

CASTILLO, et al., FORCE IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH

AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL OTHER

Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

(ECF No. 1.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

21 Mark Anthony Scott (“Plaintiff”) is a former prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on April 27, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Correctional Officer (C/O) David Castillo, Sergeant Justin Anderson, Christian Pfieffer (Warden), Ralph Diaz (Secretary, CDCR), and a Doe Defendant (C/O) (collectively, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.