Ramsey

(HC) Prince v. Ramsey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20212:20-cv-01962California621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SWANK PRINCE, No. 2: 20-cv-1962 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER MICHAEL RAMSEY, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a former state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons stated herein, petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended petition raising all claims he intends to raise in this action, exhausted and unexhausted. On April 19, 2021, the undersigned ordered petitioner to inform the court within thirty days whether he intended to raise the claims raised in his pending state appeal in the instant action. (ECF No. 21.) If petitioner intended to raise his appellate claims in the instant action, the undersigned ordered petitioner to file a motion to stay pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005), or Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2002). (Id.) If petitioner requested a stay 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.