Stallings

Stallings v. Ferrera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20212:18-cv-02073California3,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO STALLINGS, by and through his No. 2:18-cv-02073-TLN-KJN guardian ad litem LAVIRRISE BYNES, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 TOM FERRERA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Pam Ahlin’s (“Ahlin”) Motion to Dismiss.1 (ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff Pablo Stallings (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 37.) Ahlin filed a reply. (ECF No. 38.) For the reasons set forth herein, Ahlin’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (ECF No. 36.) /// /// /// ///

This action also names Tom Ferrera (“Ferrera”) and Dolly Matteucci (“Matteucci”) as Defendants. Neither Ferrera nor Matteucci join in the instant motion. The Court refers to all three named Defendants collectively as “Defendants.” I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from Defendants’ allegedly unlawful failure to abide by a state court order to transfer Plaintiff to a mental health facility and Plaintiff’s subsequent mental deterioration during the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.