Petersen

Petersen v. Buyard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20211:20-cv-00954California698 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:20-cv-00954-DAD-EPG (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS

MEKISHA BUYARD, (ECF No. 23) Defendant. 15 On April 15, 2021, the Court entered findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the appeal of Plaintiff’s criminal case. (ECF No. 25). On May 3, 2021, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision. United States v. Peterson, 995 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2021). Also on May 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time, requesting a sixty- day extension of the time to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 27; see ECF No. 23). Plaintiff stated that, because the motion to dismiss relies on California law, he needed additional time to obtain California legal research materials from his institution of confinement. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.