Lattimore
(PC) Polk v. Lattimore
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN MAE POLK, Case No. 1:12-cv-01156-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND THE
v. TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY
PENDING THE COURT’S RULING ON
LATTIMORE, et al., DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT BASED ON EXHAUSTION
Defendants. (ECF No. 153) 16 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint against Defendant Baron for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On July 23, 2021, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust her available administrative remedies. (ECF No. 147.) Following an extension of time, Plaintiff’s opposition is currently due on or before October 12, 24 …