Lattimore

(PC) Polk v. Lattimore

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20211:12-cv-01156California860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN MAE POLK, Case No. 1:12-cv-01156-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND THE

v. TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY

PENDING THE COURT’S RULING ON

LATTIMORE, et al., DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT BASED ON EXHAUSTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 153) 16 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint against Defendant Baron for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On July 23, 2021, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust her available administrative remedies. (ECF No. 147.) Following an extension of time, Plaintiff’s opposition is currently due on or before October 12, 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.