Pacillas

(PC) Walker v. Pacillas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20211:21-cv-01128California442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON PAUL WALKER, Case No. 1:21-cv-01128-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO SUBMIT APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

O. PACILLAS, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 On July 29, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff, within 45 days, to submit a court-provided application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this action in full. (Doc. 3.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent power to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.