Erasmus

Erasmus v. Charles W. Perry, M.D., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20212:21-cv-00915California3,840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 MEGAN D. ERASMUS, No. 2:21-cv-00915-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

MOTION TO DISMISS

CHARLES W. PERRY, M.D., INC, a California Professional Corporation, dba Chrysalis Cosmetics, 17 Defendant.

19 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Megan D. Erasmus (“plaintiff”) brought this action against Charles W. Perry, M.D., Inc. (“defendant”) seeking injunctive relief, damages, and a declaratory judgment against defendant for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et. seq., and violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51-53. Defendant now moves to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety. (See Mot. to Dismiss at 2 (Docket No. 6).) I. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff is a California resident who is completely deaf and therefore relies entirely on closed captioning to understand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.