Beech
Beech v. San Joaquin County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELINDA BEECH, No. 2:15-cv-00268-TLN-CDK Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY; and Does 1 through 50, 15 Defendants.
17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant San Joaquin County’s (“County”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58) and Defendant Stockton Police Officers Kirsten McClure (“Officer McClure”), Joshua DeJong (“Officer DeJong”), and Christopher Pulliam’s (“Officer Pulliam”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59). Plaintiff Melinda Beech (“Plaintiff”) opposes both motions. (ECF Nos. 61, 66.) County and the individual Defendants both replied. (ECF Nos. 64, 67.) For the reasons set forth below, County’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58) is GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59) is DENIED. / / / / / / / / / I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND1 On July 27, 2013, Plaintiff attended a party at a residence in Stockton, California,…