(PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20212:18-cv-01020California350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LULL, No. 2:18-cv-01020-MCE-EFB (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 On August 31, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on September 16, 2021, and they were considered by the undersigned. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.