Hodan

(PC) Hill v. Hodan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20211:21-cv-01311California201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN TRACEY HILL, Case No. 1:21-cv-01311-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

v. DISREGARDING MOTION AS MOOT

ELI HODAN, et al., (Docs. 3, 6)

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff adequately shows that he is unable to afford the costs of this action.1 Accordingly, his current motion to proceed IFP (Doc. 6) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s previous motion to proceed IFP (Doc. 3) is DISREGARDED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 27, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25 26 1 Plaintiff is civilly detained at Coalinga State Hospital. Persons civilly detained pursuant to California 27 Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600, et seq., are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and thus the Act’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.