Hodan
(PC) Hill v. Hodan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN TRACEY HILL, Case No. 1:21-cv-01311-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND
v. DISREGARDING MOTION AS MOOT
ELI HODAN, et al., (Docs. 3, 6)
Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff adequately shows that he is unable to afford the costs of this action.1 Accordingly, his current motion to proceed IFP (Doc. 6) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s previous motion to proceed IFP (Doc. 3) is DISREGARDED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 27, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25 26 1 Plaintiff is civilly detained at Coalinga State Hospital. Persons civilly detained pursuant to California 27 Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600, et seq., are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and thus the Act’s…