Reyes

(PC) McNeely v. Reyes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:20-cv-02551California412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RUFUS McNEELEY, No. 2:20-cv-2551-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

E. REYES, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 27, 2021, defendant Reyes, the sole defendant in this case, filed a motion for summary judgment and informed plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998). ECF No. 18. The time for responding to the motion passed, and plaintiff failed to file an opposition or otherwise respond. On September 3, 2021, the court warned plaintiff that failure to respond to the motion could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 20. The court also provided plaintiff a 21-day extension of time to respond. Id. The time for acting has once again passed and plaintiff has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.