Brager

Brager v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:19-cv-00044California9,116 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE BRAGER, No. 2:19-cv-00044-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a corporation; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. 17 Through this action, Plaintiff Kyle Brager (“Plaintiff” or “Brager”) seeks to recover damages from his former employer, Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Defendant” or “Costco”), for sexual orientation harassment (hostile work environment); disability discrimination; failure to accommodate; failure to engage in interactive process; failure to prevent discrimination, harassment and retaliation; retaliation; and wrongful termination. See Complaint, ECF No. 1, Ex. 1. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (ECF No. 8) (“Motion”). For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.1 27 1 Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.