Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ORLANDO GARCIA, No. 2:20-cv-02163-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELCOME NATOMAS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 14 Defendant. 15 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5). That Motion is GRANTED. On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), all allegations of material fact must be accepted as true and construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Cahill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 80 F.3d 336, 337-38 (9th Cir. 1996). Rule 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” in order to “give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). A complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not require detailed…