(SS) Tantau v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20211:19-cv-01793California3,331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY BERTLOW TANTAU, Case No. 1:19-cv-01793-HBK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER1 v. (Doc. No. 1) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 This cause is before the undersigned on Plaintiff’s appeal of an administrative decision denying her August 9, 2016 application for a Period of Disability and Disability Insurance Benefits. (Doc. No. 1). The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff was not under a disability, as defined in the Social Security Act, from the alleged disability onset date of December 20, 2015, through January 30, 2019, the date of the ALJ’s decision. (AR 15-31). Plaintiff has exhausted her available administrative remedies and the case is properly before the Court. The undersigned has reviewed the record, the memoranda, and the applicable law. For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned orders that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed. I. ISSUES ON APPEAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.