Rough

Rough v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:19-cv-01340California4,718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MEGAN ROUGH, individually and on No. 2:19-cv-01340-MCE-DB behalf of all similarly situated current and former employees of DEFENDANTS in the State of California, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. 18 By way of this action, Plaintiff Megan Rough seeks relief on behalf of herself and others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”) against their former employer, Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Defendant”). According to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 32), Defendant failed to correctly pay Plaintiff all minimum, regular, and overtime wages owed by failing: (1) to factor a “nondiscretionary punctuality bonus” into the regular rate of pay for purposes of calculating overtime wages and (2) to compensate employees for off-the-clock (“OTC”) time employees accrued between clocking out and completing Defendant’s exit security procedures. As a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.