(PC) Kononov v. Sacramento Count/City Main Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:20-cv-01110California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VITALY KONONOV, No. 2:20-cv-1110 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN JAIL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 10, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Instead of filing objections, plaintiff has attempted to file a second amended complaint, which is untimely. In addition, the proposed second amended complaint does not cure the defects of the prior, dismissed complaints. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.