Darlene

(PC) Stith v. Darlene

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:21-cv-01478California387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THEODORE ERVIN STITH, No. 2:21-cv-1478-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DARLENE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 23, 2021, the court found that plaintiff had neither paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) nor requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 3. Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit the application required by § 1915(a). Id. The court also warned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted another application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.