(HC) Lane v. Superior Court, County of Sacramento, CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:19-cv-02320California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DEMORRIS LANE, No. 2:19-cv-02320 TLN DB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO, CA,

14 Respondent.

16 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 17 U.S.C. § 2254. By order dated June 7, 2021, the court ordered petitioner to inform the court 18 whether he had exhausted his claims before the highest state court. (ECF No. 12.) Petitioner was 19 informed that if he had not presented these claims to the highest state court, the petition must be 20 dismissed. (Id.) Plaintiff was given thirty days to inform the court as to whether he had 21 presented any federal constitutional claims to the California Supreme court. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff 22 was warned that failure to abide by the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this 23 action be dismissed. (Id.) 24 Thirty days have passed. Plaintiff has not informed the court if he believes he exhausted 25 these claims,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.