Brewer

(PS) Smith v. Brewer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:19-cv-01918California693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEAN T. SMITH, No. 2:19-cv-1918 TLN DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENNIS BREWER, an individual domiciled in New Jersey; WINNETT PERICO, INC., a Colorado corporation, d.b.a. WINNETTORGANICS; WINNETTORGANICS, a business entity of unknown type; WINNETTORGANICS CATTLE COMPANY, INC., a Colorado corporation; WINNETT CATTLE COMPANY, INC. a Colorado corporation,

Defendants. 20 On September 24, 2021, this matter came before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19) for hearing of plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 26.) Attorneys Geoffrey Evers and Richard Lambert appeared via Zoom on behalf of the plaintiff. Defendant Dennis Brewer appeared via Zoom pro se. At the hearing defendant Brewer expressed a desire to oppose default judgment. Defendant Brewer is advised that defendant’s default was entered on October 29, 2019. (ECF No. 10.) However, “Rule 55(c) [of the Federal Rules of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.