Jones

(PS) Ervin v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:19-cv-01883California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY WAYNE ERVIN, No. 2:19-cv-01883-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER JAMES DRENNAN, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 30, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 59), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On January 20, 2021, plaintiff filed untimely objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 62), which nevertheless have been considered by the court. On February 3, 2021, defendants filed a response to those objections. (ECF No. 63.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the matter on the applicable law. See Orand v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.