(PS) Griffith v. Paran LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:21-cv-01314California894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL GRIFFITH AND DETRICK No. 2:21-cv-01314-JAM-CKD PS

CURTIS CONERLY,

Plaintiffs,

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 3) AND

GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AN

AMENDED COMPLAINT

PARAN LLP,

Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Detrick Curtis Conerly proceeds pro se in this action seeking to enforce a foreign judgment. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On September 8, 2021, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and recommended dismissal without leave to amend on grounds that the complaint failed to state a claim and failed to set forth a basis for the court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiff has filed a document entitled “Supplemental Complaint” (ECF No. 4) and has filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5). In the objections filed on September 24, 2021, plaintiff Conerly notes that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.