(PS) Griffith v. Paran LLP
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL GRIFFITH AND DETRICK No. 2:21-cv-01314-JAM-CKD PS
CURTIS CONERLY,
Plaintiffs,
ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
v. RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 3) AND
GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AN
AMENDED COMPLAINT
PARAN LLP,
Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Detrick Curtis Conerly proceeds pro se in this action seeking to enforce a foreign judgment. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On September 8, 2021, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and recommended dismissal without leave to amend on grounds that the complaint failed to state a claim and failed to set forth a basis for the court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiff has filed a document entitled “Supplemental Complaint” (ECF No. 4) and has filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5). In the objections filed on September 24, 2021, plaintiff Conerly notes that the…