(PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Garrison Jones, No. 2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. Velocity Technology Solutions, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Garrison Jones alleges his former employer, Velocity Technology Solutions, interfered with his rights under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is not represented by counsel in 19 this action. The matter has thus been referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge under this 20 District’s Local Rules. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21). Velocity moves to dismiss the complaint under Rule 41(b) and 12(b)(6), and the Magistrate Judge recommends granting the motion in part 22 and denying it in part. Mr. Jones objects to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 93. 23 Velocity has not filed objections. The court has reviewed the matter de novo. First, the Magistrate Judge recommends denying Velocity’s motion to dismiss under Rule 41(b). F&Rs at 3. The court adopts…