Leddy

(UD)(PS) Quinn Crossing, LLC v. Leddy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20212:21-cv-01745California427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Quinn Crossing, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-01745-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. Adriel Leddy, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Defendant Adriel Leddy, who appears pro se, removed this unlawful detainer action from Solano County Superior Court. See Not. Removal, ECF No. 1. Leddy has also moved to proceed iw forma pauperis. See Mot., ECF No. 2. The court has reviewed the complaint and notice of removal and has determined on its own motion that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. This action is thus remanded to the state court. When a case “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” is 23 initially brought in state court, a defendant may remove it to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). 24 There are two primary bases for federal subject matter jurisdiction. First, under § 1331, district 25 courts have federal question jurisdiction over “all civil actions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.